A New Approach Is Needed

by Zvi Baranoff

Throughout human history, we have perceived - incorrectly - that there are unlimited resources. Our ancestors saw unending forests, lots of animals, long and winding rivers that seemed to go on forever, and assumed that the Earth could give to them endlessly. 

Localized shortages were resolved by simply moving along until again they again found unlimited wealth. Slashing, burning, plowing and harvesting, civilization marched on, destroying ecosystems and depleting soil with little long term understanding or concern. This was the way of humanity prior to industrialization and such an approach continued to hold sway with the development of industrial capabilities.

With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, the common assumption – held by both the “Left” and the “Right”, by proponents of Capitalism and the mirror image proponents of Communism as well as the various ideologies that lay in between – is that with proper management and enough growth we can increase production, creating more and more wealth, and over time improve the living conditions of the human race. This presumption is based on the industrial myth that more and more energy is available, more and more resources can be mined, more and more products can be produced …essentially, that “more” is always possible and inherently better.

The industrial model has brought us many advances, but the progress has not come without its costs. We have become dependent on fossil fuels and mass production resulting in enormous waste, having created a culture where we work endlessly to produce and consume more without satisfaction and to the detriment of our physical, mental and spiritual health.  

We do not have the ability to continuously produce more, and even for our current level of wasteful production to continue is contingent on the availability of relatively inexpensive sources of energy. While the industrial capitalist model has not run out of gas yet, the costs of fueling the mechanism have gotten more expensive and the price will continue to rise. We have reached a key juncture where we must decide what direction our civilization should take and how we move forward from here.

Issues concerning poverty and environmental sustainability are interwoven and need to be approached as part of the same fabric. We need a long term strategy that challenges many dominant assumptions. It is not enough to merely establish programs that feed the poor and house the homeless, although those tasks are certainly noble and needed. 

We need to establish the conditions that will allow us to recreate the very nature of our economic relationships and integrate our understanding of the environment, taking into account how we will choose to live in harmony with our planet. A new paradigm is required, not merely to bring a basic level of potential to each and every one of us, but to guarantee our collective survival.

A common understanding needs to be developed between activists working on social justice issues and on environmental issues that will lead to the development of sustainable ecological communities. Decentralized planning based on local conditions must be used to address fundamental issues of producing and supplying food, energy and shelter in a sustainable manner. 

This goes way beyond soup kitchens and emergency shelter for the needy. That kind of emergency stop gap approach has the possibility of serving as a bridge to longer term planning, but the crisis that is faced by the impoverished amongst us is a foreshadow of what we all face collectively if we do not in all seriousness begin a transition to an approach that reevaluates our expectations and reorganizes our daily lives.

It is high time that divergent organizations working on housing issues, solar energy development, gardening and farming issues, transportation, educational access and a whole range of economic and environmental issues find ways to work together, integrating their approach toward a common vision. Both in the most developed industrialized regions of the world and in the least developed villages we must now be coming to an understanding that we face many of the same issues, are threatened by many of the same dangers and our hope lies in shared solutions. We need to resolve the issues surrounding our resources, energy use and land use with a clear understanding that we need to live in a way that is sustainable to guarantee that future generations of humans can continue to inhabit this blue-green planet.

Some of the finest work is being done in the most decentralized manner. Thoughtful community planning can reduce the need for commuting and make basic resources locally available. Access to educational opportunities via computers through the Internet connects individuals even in very diverse communities. Bicycles provide virtually free transportation to any able bodied person on this planet. Self sustained housing that integrates proper land use, passive solar energy and food production offers long term answer to homelessness and hunger. 

Even in the most advanced nations and urbanized regions much of the food production can be through localized sources. During World War II, as a relatively recent historical perspective, 50% of the USA food was from backyard Victory Gardens. Eating from your own or your neighbor’s garden is a wiser and healthier choice for anyone and an essential way to end dependence on industrial farming practices and corporate control of the food supply. 

The various step by step approaches, when integrated, become an overall strategy of cultural, political and economic transformation. By developing and promoting approaches that are low impact, sustainable and self sufficient we can implement this new sort of development in any environment. Through the simple sharing of basic tools and knowledge we can bring a balanced prosperity to people worldwide.

We are at an important crossroad. One road leads to continued environmental destruction, scarce resources and warfare. The other path offers true peace and prosperity through the reevaluation of our needs and making informed choices about the way we hope to live. We need to head down the path that will lead to a greener, more satisfying future.

Kathy Chang, Where Are You Now?

by Zvi Baranoff

Kathy believed in peace, justice and environmental sanity. She vacillated between great hope and despair. She saw the great potential of the human spirit and could not accept brutality, ignorance and ugliness. She dedicated her life to social change. She believed so much in the possibility of Change she changed her name from “Chang” to “Change”!

Kathy was a truly inspiration being when she was “on”. Her public image was beauty personified. She was colorful and projected art with her very being. She felt she could do as she pleased and when she pleased. Kathy made you feel as if you were important and what you did mattered. She did not see the social barriers that define most of our lives.

Kathy believed that if the wealth of the world is shared, there will be no suffering from the ravages of poverty. Where there are abandoned buildings on the one hand and homeless people on the other, Kathy’s solution was the obvious.

With fanfare she led a ragged band into two empty houses in Philly and used her inheritance money to fund the squat. It was an eclectic band of hippies, punks, wannabes, crazies and idealists, a much younger “me” amongst them. Dubbed “Squat Central “, the liberated zone was an epicenter of cultural, political, emotional and artistic turmoil. Living there felt like living at the center of the universe.

Not far from MOVE's initial standoff with Rizzo’s thuggish Philadelphia police department, a colorful, arrogant, confused and antagonistic collection of dreamers challenged the status quo and brought the politics of possibility to the streets of Philadelphia and often the pages of the Philadelphia newspapers.

When the Daily News ran a front page photo of an angelic looking nun being arrested at a Marijuana Legalization rally at Independence Mall, only a chosen few knew that the “nun” was a lesbian stripper that lived at Squat Central and was arrested for flashing! When Eldridge Cleaver – during his Moonie Cult Road Tour – was hit with a flying apple pie, no arrests were made but the Philly police probably recognized the pie thrower. They sat in front of the Squat with their lights on for a while. Politics mixed with youthful angst and the waves of insanity. Kathy was at the center of it.

Freedom, with all of the absurdity that comes with it, was an essential element of anything Kathy was involved with. At our street demonstrations (held without permits) we always had an open mike.  One never knew what sort of ranting would be expressed by the rabble we attracted. Sometimes pure genius would bloom, sometimes merely madness.

The Squat projected an aura of bravado and strength.  Months of newspaper articles about squatters, and the issues surrounding housing as well as the cultural issues raised led up to a final conflict. When the police eventually raided the Squat, in spite the comparisons to the MOVE standoff and the vows to never leave, the occupation ended not with an apocalyptic battle but with a whimper. Someone had left the door unlocked and the cops walked right in while we slept! I suspect it an informant/provocateur was responsible (and I have a suspicion of who that might have been) but it could also have been simple carelessness. There was enough of that to go around! Coincidentally, the Squat fell shortly after Kathy’s money ran out.

Kathy believed in social transformation with a religious fervor. She was a Psychedelic End Times preacher. She believed in the human potential to change everything, to let go of old prejudices, to wake up in a new Evolutionary era. She saw the planet at a critical juncture and believed that everyone must get on board to set thing right, to avoid total destruction. “Hurry up and slow down!” was a slogan and a principle. She would meet with anyone and talk to anyone with sincerity. Of course, not everyone approached her in the same way. She lived for freedom. With her money gone and no job, she was dependent as well. She wasn’t always treated well by the men she chose to live with.

One night I got a phone call from her, a call from the police station. She had been picked up by the Philadelphia police because she had been walking in West Philly – naked. The police were quite willing to send her on her way if she would simply get dressed before leaving. Of course, I had to argue with her to accept this social compromise. My landlady and I begged her, and finally convinced her, to put some clothes on and leave with us. She seemed to not understand what the problem was with her late night stroll. 

Kathy killed herself on the University of Pennsylvania campus in 1996. Visually and physically like the Buddhist monks of Vietnam, she poured gasoline over herself and her robes and set herself on fire. The political effect was unlike that of the monks. The world did not sit up and take notice. The country did not erupt into revolution. The emotional effect on those who saw it and on those that knew and loved her was shock and disbelief. From the end of the Squat era until Kathy’s untimely but dramatic exodus in 1996, Kathy sang, danced, ranted, waved flags, made speeches and generally protested the status quo. In a packet of her writings that she delivered to The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Daily Pennsylvanian, and several of her friends on the morning of her death, she explained the rationale behind her suicide:

"I want to protest the present government and economic system and the cynicism and passivity of the people as emphatically as I can. But primarily, I want to get publicity in order to draw attention to my proposal for immediate social transformation. To do this I plan to end my own life. The attention of the media is only caught by acts of violence. My moral principles prevent me from doing harm to anyone else or their property, so I must perform this act of violence against myself. It is a waste of energy to get angry and gripe at the government. The government must be replaced with a truly democratic self-government of, for and by the people. Those working in industries essential to maintaining life should democratically take over their workplaces and organize an emergency economy to supply the needs of the people. The rest of the people should meet in their communities to organize a new directly democratic community-based self-government."

Kathy was often jubilant. Those that knew her better knew she also went through periods of despair. She believed that one can change the world through joy. This is a position similar to some Hassidic Rabbis, Sufis, Zen Masters, and Ken Kesey’s Merry Pranksters.  Joy, however, is hard to maintain, especially in the face of so much that is wrong in this world. Kathy wanted the world to simply wake up from the nightmare and begin to live in joy. She wanted the Messianic Age without waiting. And in her heart she truly believed that her final act would bring it about.

So much of what Kathy said and the way she lived was true, pure and beautiful. The premise that she based the taking of her own life was false.  She acted as if it was her right to end her own life and that somehow that would transform the world. What she didn’t know or refused to accept is that the changes that she (and I) deeply believed are essential, and should be implemented immediately will unfortunately take a minute or two longer than that.

But so much has moved forward in the 15 years since Kathy’s death. The manifestos that Kathy wrote about peace and environmental issues were quirky in the 1980’s. They now reflect the perspective of a growing number of activists worldwide. The synergy that we only saw as a possibility with the help of L.S.D. is now being actualized through the communications revolution, exchanges of ideas and energies worldwide being propelled through the Internet. And when our little ragtag band called for the legalization of marijuana, it only seemed possible to us because we were stoned. Today the debate of legalization has gone mainstream and the end on Prohibition may actually be near.

Kathy wrote in her final statement: “My moral principles prevent me from doing harm to anyone else or their property, so I must perform this act of violence against myself.” What hubris, I would tell her, if I had that option. You don’t “own” yourself. You are part of the whole. You have responsibilities that include sticking around for the hard work, the slogging through the muck, to be part of history, to be part of the change. I wish I could argue with her, struggle with her, debate with her. She should still be here with us. We have so much more to do. We could use your help, Kathy. I guess we’ll just have to carry on without you.

I want to argue with her. I wish she was here so I could tell her how mad I am at her. When I lived in Philly, she would bounce ideas off me, but I had long since moved on, living in Arizona and working on other projects. Our struggle – our very lives – are made up of victories and losses, successes and failures, steps forward and missteps and falls.

Kathy, why weren’t you there to sing and dance at my wedding? Why weren’t you there to rant and protest when I was arrested? Why weren’t you there to write me poetic and uplifting letters when I was in prison? And why aren’t you here to work and argue and plan with us now?

She didn’t give me the opportunity to challenge the path she chose. She got the final word. Once she set the fire, the chance to dialogue was over. How can one argue with the dead? Kathy was so right about so much. Her death, however, was so wrong.

Culture, Religion and Healing Plants

by Zvi Baranoff

History begins with the written word; before the written word is “pre-history”.

Particularly over the last 2000 years with the rise and spread of Christianity and Islam we have become a “People of the Book”. This worldview has led to a general suppression of direct religious experience, substituting Gnostic awareness with book knowledge and ecstatic experience with legalisms.  There have been exceptions within this stream but the dominant Western religious trend has been a legalistic duality that places the relationship to God into the hands of experts and the direct experience outside of the realm of the common man.

Do we change reality by writing about it? Is history what happened or is it what we read about what happened? There is a Jewish tradition that God created the universe with the Alphabet. Our understanding of human culture is deeply rooted in the written word. Truly written language has provided us with a great boon. We have the ability to maintain records, share information and learn and teach each other. The written word has a positive power, but unfortunately we tend to miss out on the knowledge available through a more direct connection.

Growing out of this way of understanding is the Western view of medicine. The world and all that is in it can be defined, labeled and identified. Western medicine tends to see the mind and body as being separate, not interconnected, and spirit as something either belonging to the realm of the religious professionals or merely as superstition. The view of mind, body and spirit all being interdependent is not a common viewpoint and is perceived as being alternative, New Age or otherwise foreign.

As a result of this way of viewing the world, Western medicine has moved away from the use of plants as medicine. While many medications are originally derived from plant substances, scientists have concentrated the aspects that they perceive to be useful. The development of heroin and cocaine are “advancements” developed from this logical scientific perspective. Heroin has come a long way from the poppy flower and cocaine is quite different than the coca leaf. In our search for scientific perfection, we created Frankenstein.

From the beginning of time man has used a wide variety of psychoactive plants for both medicinal value and religious experience. The use of plant induced changes in consciousness  have been consistently suppressed by all three of the dominant monotheistic faiths with the exception of sacramental wine that has been used by Jews and to a lesser extent by Christians. Europe has been dominated by Christianity. The ancient cultic use of plants have all been suppressed and generally purged from European history.

Beyond the Western world, in the unconquered jungles of Africa and the Americas and the inhospitable deserts of the Americas as well, the Gnostic traditions continued. Three psychoactive healing plants with some similar properties are peyote (from the American desert), ayahuasca (from the South American jungles) and Iboga (from the jungles of Western Central Africa).

All three substances have likely been used from the early mists of time. However, the cultures that use these plants have no traditional written language and therefore no “history” of their own. History is written by the victors and the victors have the power of the written word.  The oral traditions that surround the religious and therapeutic use of these plants are fluid and change with time. The conquering Western worldview based in the written word is in direct juxtaposition to the unwritten traditions of indigenous peoples.

The shamanistic oral traditions and the use of psychoactive plants were considered “demonic” by the invading political and religious culture. Interestingly enough however, the religious use of all three of these substances have grown as a direct result of European conquest and the attempted suppression of indigenous culture. The use of peyote spread well beyond the Mexican and Texan deserts and developed into a central aspect of a broad religious experience that transcended the tribal differences in the Americas. Likewise, over the last 300 years the religious use of iboga has spread, making Bwiti the fastest growing religion in Africa. The rise of the Santo Daime religion follows a similar, though more recent, pattern.

The use of these substances for both medicine and religion reflects a worldview that sees mind, body and spirit as being of one cloth. The spread of these practices as a result of contact with Western influences can be seen as a natural attempt to heal from the damaging affects of domination by outside forces.

Literate and intelligent, Western man sees himself as rational. After giving up the spiritual world to religious professionals, he gave the healing arts to medical professionals. Freedom from these responsibilities however leaves a void. Alcoholism and drug dependence result from this unnatural dichotomy and unhealthy relationship with our inner selves. This may explain why iboga, peyote and ayahuasca – ancient indigenous religious and healing plants - have use in breaking the dependencies on the dominant drugs of Western culture.

We will see how it works out. The final chapter has yet to be written.

Making The Connections

by Zvi Baranoff
Inescapably linked are the global dependency on petroleum, water quality issues, soil depletion and the effects of the dominant industrial and farming methods.

We must develop programs that simultaneously wean the most developed nations from the disastrous over consumption and the self-destructive dependence on petro-chemicals while bringing impoverished communities the opportunities of self sufficiency.  There is a need for an integrated approach to dealing with the issues of ecological degradation and poverty. The two issues cannot be dealt with separately.

Historically, changes in human culture and the technologies that we use have been made without the ability to foresee the long term effects of the new techniques. When we learned to control fire, tame and domesticate animals or plant seeds we could not have even considered the possibilities of coal burning power plants and the internal combustion engine or the deforestation and soil depletion as effects of overgrazing and agriculture.

For the first time in human history, we can now make important collective decisions about the direction of our planetary culture and choose the direction of its development. We have a greater access to the world of knowledge than at any time in our past. With a few keystrokes we can now share a wealth of information. That power necessitates greater responsibility. We must choose wisely.

It is most important to move forward in the implication of a post-industrial society. The more developed nations need to now choose practices that avert disaster and nourish sustainable culture. The undeveloped countries and those living at a pre-industrial level can now choose to essentially skip the intermediate steps and make the jump to a post-industrial society.

We must now recognize the interconnectedness of all human cultures and of all human endeavors. What we each choose affects us all. We have a common mission.

Our mission is threefold.

1. Education and training in transitional technologies: This involves new construction methods, non-polluting energy sources and improved food production using an organic permaculture model. The new technologies are available and it is time to implement them quickly throughout the world.

2. Direct material aid to communities in need: Extreme poverty anywhere in the world affects us all. Those of us with greater access to resources need to foster programs that gather and ship equipment to communities in need focusing on appropriate technology such as solar panels, low impact technology such as bicycles, improved agricultural technology such as drip irrigation and computers to help close the “information divide”.

3. Establishing sustainable programs: We must work with local groups worldwide to assist in setting up sustainable, transformative programs in communities of need. Each community should certainly act independently in their own self interest. Where we have greater strengths, we have a responsibility to share and have a great opportunity to learn from each other.

There are more important choices available to us than paper or plastic, Coke or Pepsi. We have before us the choice to create a future worth handing to the next generation.

There's Nothing New Under The Sun

by Zvi Baranoff

There is a tendency for each generation to think that they created something new, for each culture to believe that they developed on their own and for each nation to believe that they are unique beyond words. However, when a couple of thousand years ago or so someone proposed that “There is nothing new under the sun” was Biblical wisdom, they were most likely quoting someone else from a far earlier age that had drawn the same conclusion!

The ideas, technologies and practices that take us forward will come out of our shared experiences and shared knowledge. We are all in this together and we have a lot to learn from each other.  As we move forward into our collective future, it’s a good idea to at least occasionally reflect on our collective past.

Any innovation in thought or practice, whether in science, religion, culture or enterprise either grew out of, developed from or heavily borrowed from something that came before. There is no shame in that. In fact, the best we have in human culture comes when we are not afraid to share. The greatest jumps forward in civilization come when we are most tolerant and open to the ideas of other cultures. Stagnation happens during periods of intolerance and fear.

When we use the World Wide Web, we may think we are doing something incredibly cutting edge and new, but we are merely following in the footsteps of our ancestors sitting around the fire telling stories – or perhaps when the first person showed another how to make fire. It is the sharing of information that enriches us.

Paper may well have been a technological advancement of importance equal to the internet today. When combined with the genius of movable typeface a revolution in communications became possible. Paper was introduced to Europe by way of the Arab world. The Arabs learned about it from the Chinese. Also introduced around the same time were Arabic numerals (the numbers we use today instead of X’s and V’s and I’s in complicated combinations) and the concept of zero.

We have to give credit to the Islamic world as well for continuing to study the Greek Classics while Christian Europe suppressed all pre-Christian knowledge as Pagan. When Europe once again opened itself up to the Classics, the Renaissance was made possible. Of course, the works then needed to be translated from the Arabic. Some Jewish scholars helped out with that little project!

We may think of South America when we drink our morning coffee, but Juan Valdez wasn’t the first to cultivate it. Coffee comes from Africa. “Chinese” tea originated in India. Irish potatoes came from the Americas. Hot and spicy peppers in Indian and Chinese foods also came from the Americas. And did the Italians learn about spaghetti from the Chinese and pizza from the Arab pita? Food for thought, eh?

More than just recipes were also exchanged along the trade routes and in the marketplaces of our predecessors. The direct relationship between the three biggies of Monotheistic religions should be fairly obvious. There may be more subtle examples of religious cross pollinating that haven’t crossed your mind.

For instance, one may see that Buddhist understanding of Tantra comes from the Hindu Kama Sutra. Have you considered that the same source may have influenced the Jewish development of Kabala with its erotic imagery? Other aspects of Kabalistic thought seem to greatly parallel a Buddhist worldview. While we are at it, did early Christians pick up a thing or two from the Buddhists? Christian monasteries are likely rooted in Buddhism as there is no Jewish historical precedent. The Devil may be in the details but my guess is that the Apocalyptic elements that found their way into Jewish thought and later became so central in Christianity with the powerful, Deity threatening  Satan taking a central role developed from Hebrew contact with the dualistic Zoroastrians during the first exile.

Hindu Indians and Sephardic Jews share the custom of henna painting of brides before the wedding. Moslems and Jews share the use of the hamsa to ward off the evil eye. The tam that Rastafarians wear comes from Scotland. The cowboy of American western lore is largely born from Mexico. Of course the horse he rode and the indigenous peoples of the continent adapted to so well is not native to the Americas, only first arriving with the Spanish. Yet, the horse seems as at home on the American Plain as the camel is at home in the Sahara. The North African Berbers used camels for centuries as the “Ships of the Desert” but camels are from Asia and were introduced to Africa by the Arabs.

Part of American cultural mythology is that Columbus convinced the Spanish Monarchy on the idea of financing his voyage while most people believed the world to be flat. Hard to say how widespread that idea was, but educated folks certainly knew otherwise for centuries. Columbus indeed took on a significant enterprise, but he probably had a much better idea of what he was heading into than our elementary school teachers let on. He had the maps and travel records of the Vikings.

There has certainly been a long history of struggles and competitions, battles and wars, but there has also been centuries of exchange and learning, sharing and growth. If we are as adaptable as I think we are, we can choose a future that skips the xenophobia and the bloodletting. We can find in our histories much common ground. 

Getting Over The Post Election Blues

There has been quite a bit of buzz on the activist websites, starting even before election day, to put the best face on the fact that we very well may (and indeed, we did) lose a very important campaign in California. (Arizona, as of this morning is still too close to call.)

The essence of the positive spin is that we have moved the nature of the debate forward in some very important ways and we are ready to start again and work on 2012. I know that it is important to put your best game face on and we certainly have a lot to be proud of. I don’t want to be a spoil sport, or seem overly whiny and I’ll certainly try to hold back that inclination.

Nonetheless, let me state the obvious: We lost where we should have won. Almost winning an electoral campaign is like almost eating or almost getting laid or almost crossing the street before the bus hits you.

Yes, we can dust ourselves off and start again. Indeed, we must. But let’s take a hard look at ourselves and our movement, analyze our weaknesses as well as our strengths and get our act together!

There is a tendency among our base to believe that change is inevitable and logic or cultural shifts will eventually correct matters. I heard that noise 35 years ago. We need to be clear. In politics, nothing is inevitable. Change happens when we make it happen. It does not happen on its own. We need to counter the tendency to just wait and let things sort out own their own.

There is also a tendency to not take the issue very seriously. Support for marijuana is a mile wide but only inches deep. Amongst our general supporters there is a feeling that other issues are more important. After all, there is war, hunger, pollution, etc. We need to show how all these issues link together and how changing marijuana policy is part of solving these other “more important” problems.

Marijuana has been so infused into pop culture in so many ways that there is a general sense that the game is already won and marijuana is virtually legal. What’s the fuss?

We need to bring the issues home. The nearly a million people a year arrested for marijuana in the USA count. The hundreds of thousands of people sitting in jails and prisons for marijuana count. The thousands of victims of our nation’s drug policy killed just across our border in Mexico count.  

But none of the above explains why we lost in California and while we are still counting votes in Arizona, which should have been a slam dunk.

What killed us is a lack of unity and focus, political immaturity, and a foot dragging. Too many so-called activists took themselves too seriously and the politics too lightly. We split hairs, let egos get in the way and held back support for the “less than perfect”.

All politics is compromise. All politics is coalition building. There is no such thing as a perfect campaign, but there is such a thing as a winning campaign.

We need to grow up and act on our common interests. When we put forward a program, we must work together to present the clearest and best winnable bill we can. We need to bring together our core base. Once the wording is decided upon, we must put aside hairsplitting over any reservations we may have and present a united front.

I sat in Federal Prison during the Presidential election. During the two years that followed, I watched a lot of positive change take place concerning marijuana policy. I am now on Federal Probation for the next 6 years. My right to vote has been stripped as a result of the enforcement of prohibition. Every vote counts. How many of our constituency is forbidden from voting? How many more will have their voting rights stripped before the next election.  

It is a good idea to evaluate the where we stand. And winning feels much better than losing. Yea, you win some and you lose some. That doesn’t make me feel much better. How about you? Let’s get our act together.

Human culture is at an important juncture

by Zvi Baranoff

Human culture is at an important juncture. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution – and over the last 100 years of so in particular – we have generated and used more and more energy, primarily petroleum.

This has allowed us to make some incredible things happen for us in a historically speaking very short time. For better or worse, this can’t go on forever. While experts may disagree on the details – when our oil supplies run out, the effects of oil consumption in regards of potential global warming – there is no doubt that continued dependence on petro-chemicals is unsustainable. Frankly, it probably can’t go on much longer and certainly shouldn’t.

So while on the one hand we grapple with the issues of how to feed, house and educate every human on Planet Earth, we must simultaneously grapple with the reality that the strategies we have used until now are not going to carry us forward. We need a new approach.

True wealth – sustainable wealth – is the energy of the sun and the fertility of the Earth. The sun shines eternally but the Earth must be nourished to maintain its fertility. We can’t continue to take out more than we put back. We must reverse that trend.

We have today the tools, expertise and growing collective willpower to end poverty, resolve our environmental challenges and transform our culture to one that satisfies everyone’s needs.

There has been some tremendously creative work accomplished over recent years by forward thinking people worldwide. We have learned to build homes that consume no energy and live off the land in a way that actually enriches rather than depletes resources.

When we develop programs to assist the world’s poorest citizens become truly independent we are making great strides for the whole of humanity and not just the individuals immediately concerned. Each community can strive to reach the point of supplying their own needs through successfully managed organic gardens, rooftop water harvesting and solar and wind electric generation. 

With access to the world of ideas as well as global markets through the internet even the remotest village or hamlet can now be on the one hand independent and on the other hand be well connected. By having access to the tools of communication, education and connectivity we can now share and learn from each other across boundaries that once were insurmountable.

With the growing economic and ecological security, matters of public health will certainly improve as well. Much illness in our most desperate communities is the direct result of malnutrition. Insufficient food makes one increasingly susceptible to disease. Additionally, extreme poverty leads to conditions were even the simplest preventative measures are unaffordable and inexpensive treatments are beyond reach.

We must create the conditions where food, shelter, basic medical care, educational opportunities and access to the creative sharing power of the world community are available to each of us. By making this possible, the whole world is enriched. A happier, more secure, healthier vibrant human culture profits us all. This is now within our reach.